To declassify or not to declassify? That is the question, when it comes to the FBI’s original evidence in the Russia collusion case.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI have tried to thwart President Trump on releasing the evidence, suggesting it will harm national security, make allies less willing to cooperate, or even leave him vulnerable to accusations that he is trying to obstruct the end of the Russia probe.
Before you judge the DOJ’s and FBI’s arguments — which are similar to those offered to stop the release of information in other major episodes of American history, from the Bay of Pigs to 9/11 — consider Footnote 43 on Page 57 of Chapter 3 of the House Intelligence Committee’s report earlier this year on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
Until this past week, the footnote really had garnered no public intrigue, in part because the U.S. intelligence community blacked out the vast majority of its verbiage in the name of national security before the report was made public.
[Why not?] [if true] D’s do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?
Why are D’s opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?
DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT – why the block?
See article above – redactions made to ‘protect’ exposing the REAL TRUTH?
McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] ‘wear a wire’
Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House
Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]
[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House
Locked & Loaded.
#Qanon #Qanon8chan @POTUS #MAGA #KAG #WeThePeople
#FollowTheWhiteRabbit #TheGreatAwakening #DeepState
#DrainTheSwamp #RedPill #TickTock
#InternetBillOfRights #WWG1WGA #HRCVideo #WINNING #TheStorm #Pedogate
#POTUS #FRAZZLEDRIP #SPYGATE #WALKAWAY